Showing posts with label Martha McSally for AZ CD-2 Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Martha McSally for AZ CD-2 Congress. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Running for Gabrielle Giffords’s House seat, is not Martha McSally’s first challenge - The Washington Post


By Ann Gerhart,

Martha McSally is drinking a Negra Modelo from the bottle at a Mexican joint here after another long day running in 103-degree heat for the honor of serving in an institution with a 13 percent approval rating.

She is the first female U.S. fighter pilot to fly in combat and the first woman to command a fighter squadron. As a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force, she sued then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld over the military requirement that servicewomen wear Muslim garb when off base in Saudi Arabia and got it changed.

It is in her constitution to charge hard at the very thing she’s been told is impossible and out of line.

Now, in her first bid for political office, she is going after the congressional seat that would seem most out of reach. Running as a Republican, she aims to replace the beloved Gabrielle Giffords, the Democratic congresswoman who was gunned down outside a Safeway on a Saturday morning while meeting with constituents, a crime that lacerated this community and horrified the nation.

To do that, McSally has to defeat the man who won a special election in June, Ron Barber, who was Giffords’s district director and was shot in the head that day.

What kind of person runs against that legacy?

“Pioneer, leader, servant” is how the retired colonel, 46, introduces herself to those she seeks to represent in one of America’s flintiest swing districts.

“Am I nuts?” is what she first asked herself after plunging into a world that is as chaotic as the military is structured.

“The special election was about the legacy, and November is about the best representation for this district,” is what she had answered at the last event, when a supporter at a small meeting gingerly brought up “the Gabby factor.”

Now, at dinner, with her elderly dog at her feet and her nephew/driver/yard-sign toter eyeing her leftovers, McSally relates how she went from being a professor in Germany in January, teaching a course on the Arab Spring, to being a candidate a week after Giffords resigned.

It is a brash story about the advice she sought, heard and then ignored — to come home to the house she bought in 1994 when stationed here at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, to put down her roots and run for school board or be a precinct chairman.


Don’t do it, you can’t be successful, you’ll be labeled a loser, she was told. Don’t blow your chances, with that impressive résumé and smarts and personal charisma, to be a political star. Take the conventional path.


“I had nothing to lose; I already had quit my job. So I said, ‘Now, what do I have to do? Probably file some paperwork, right?’ ” McSally, who is single, says with a grin.

For better or worse, that is not how McSally is constructed. Her formerprofession, in some part, may explain that. In war, there are casualties. Losses are mourned, but sentiment is not part of the mission. She has never met Giffords or gone to look at the supermarket where so much carnage took place.

The rest of the explanation, the larger part, is McSally’s obvious relish for blazing the most difficult trails. She’s feisty and funny, blunt and occasionally profane.

When former Republican senator Rick Santorum took a stand against women in combat during his presidential bid, McSally went on television and said she “wanted to go kick him in the Jimmy” for saying that.

She went to a private lunch earlier this month to persuade an elusive donor to give to her campaign. “And I didn’t even have to give the pitch, because he said right away he was going to give me $2,500,” McSally recalled. “You know what I said? Are you married? Not because I wanted to date him! Because I wanted to know if he had a wife who could max out, too!”

Taking on politics

In her new career, it’s a great day when an attack ad is launched against you. It means somebody has decided it’s worth spending money to defeat you.

“I was . . . ooo, I’m almost a little afraid to look! My first attack ad!” McSally peers through her fingers as she campaigns before a dozen people in the housing business who are meeting at a local restaurant. The room breaks into laughter.

“And then I just had to crack up, because it’s a picture of me with recipe cards. . . . I’m in the kitchen cooking up bad recipes, which is in itself overtly sexist and insulting,” and the women in the room frown and shake their heads.

“I couldn’t tell if I was barefoot, too, they didn’t show my feet,” continues McSally about the ad, from House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s political action committee.

“But c’mon! Me of all people! I spent 26 years in the military. I was too busy shooting 30mm out of my A-10 at the Taliban and al-Qaeda to even learn to cook!” And then the men all frown and shake their heads vigorously, too.

Long ago, McSally embraced daunting obstacles and accepted there would be distasteful tasks along the way. She gave the nuns trouble in high school and her mother trouble at home, then carried her defiance into the Air Force Academy, where she showed up with her hair an inch shorter than it was required to be.

(And there’s still trouble with that hair. “You wouldn’t believe how many supporters have something to say about how I look. I wear it down, they tell me to put it up,” she said with a laugh. “I pull it back, and they tell me to wear it down.”)

She didn’t decide to become a pilot until she realized that, at 5-foot-3, she was too short.

She badgered for two years to get a waiver and built up her leg muscles. She got a master’s degree in public policy from Harvard’s Kennedy School before entering flight school, the same year she won the military division of the Hawaiian Ironman World Triathlon.

She sued Rumsfeld after unsuccessfully trying through channels to change the abaya rule, which she insisted violated her religious freedom as an evangelical Christian and discriminated against her gender. She found support from an unlikely coalition of conservative Republicans and liberal feminists, which she now tells voters proves her ability to forge consensus around principle.


Her own political positions are not so easily categorized. She says her priorities are deficit reduction, economic growth, immigration and tax code reform, and protecting the border, 85 miles of which form the southern edge of her district. She’s antiabortion and supports Title X, a federal program that funds family planning.


The district is a true swing district, with its 376,000 registered voters divided nearly evenly between Republicans, Democrats and independents, and while most race-watchers still favor Barber to win, McSally has made it a tighter race than expected.

She has run mostly on her own biography and an assertion that, as a former commander, she will quickly gather all the pertinent intelligence rather than shooting off her mouth.

Monday, October 15, 2012

Barber, McSally make race for District 2 unpredictable By Rebekah L. Sanders





In Congressional District 2, tucked into Arizona’s southeastern corner, Democratic U.S. Rep. Ron Barber has been considered the front-runner for the Nov. 6 election. But the race is shaping up to be tougher than some experts predicted.

GOP challenger Martha McSally is appealing to female voters, veterans and independents with her background of breaking barriers as a woman in the military and her measured approach to discussing issues.

District 2, which includes Tucson, Sierra Vista and Douglas, is considered a political toss-up district.

“Voters will not vote the party line,” said David Steele, a Tucson Democratic political strategist.

Barber courted the Democratic base during a special election earlier this year to fill the rest of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords’ term in Congress, according to Steele, but also reached out to moderates.

“Now, he and McSally are fighting over those same voters,” Steele said.
Two wildly divergent polls show it’s tough to gauge exactly how voters are leaning.

Earlier this month, a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee poll indicated Barber was up by 14 percentage points.

McSally’s campaign countered with a survey indicating the two were tied, each with 47 percent of the vote. Both polls had a margin of error of plus or minus 4.9 percentage points.

Republicans say McSally is doing the unthinkable: gaining on Barber. The National Republican Congressional Committee, spurred by a belief in McSally’s traction, recently put $330,000 into the party’s first broadcast ads.
Democrats dispute that assessment, maintaining that Barber’s campaign remains strong.

As evidence, they point to the national Democratic Party’s decision to decrease spending on television ads in the district.

National firms that track House races have kept District 2 as leaning Democrat.


McSally has support

A political newcomer, McSally, 46, has gained support in large part because of her background and energy on the campaign trail. When quizzed on her knowledge of the district or policy details, she is generally perceived as weaker than Barber.

McSally moved to Tucson in 1994 on military assignment. She was the first female Air Force pilot and squadron commander to serve in combat and retired in 2010 as a colonel after more than 20 years.

While in the military, McSally sued the Department of Defense to overturn a requirement that female personnel in Saudi Arabia wear Muslim clothing off base.

She holds two master’s degrees, taught national- security studies in Germany and served a year in Washington, D.C., as a legislative aide to Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl.

McSally’s challenges are steep. She is running in a district that has sent Democrats to Congress in the past four elections, despite having more registered Republicans than Democrats.

And now, with the redrawn districts this year, District 2’s slight Republican-voter-registration edge has shrunk.

She was behind Barber in the most recent financial reports, although Republicans say McSally’s fundraising has gained steam.

Barber brought in more than $330,000 while McSally raised nearly $270,000 from April 1 to June 30. The next quarterly financial reports are due Monday.

Yet McSally appears to be making strides with voters, including the all-important independents.

Martha Conyne, a 54-year-old University of Arizona administrative assistant, eagerly approached McSally at a recent campaign rally at a Tucson restaurant.

“I am an independent, pro-choice person who will work as hard as I can for you. I really believe in what you’re doing,” Conyne told her.

Conyne said McSally’s anti-abortion stance is not a deal breaker. She said she will vote for McSally because of her military experience, “firecracker” attitude and emphasis on the economy.

“The most important issue is economic security,” Conyne said. “Chaos ensues when people don’t have jobs and businesses can’t function.”

Among McSally’s economic proposals are cutting federal regulations and lowering taxes.

Democrats’ main attacks on McSally center on her stances on Social Security and Medicare.

McSally promises to maintain both programs for current seniors. But on Social Security, she has said she supports “gradually increasing the retirement age for younger workers” and allowing beneficiaries “to invest part of their benefits for higher returns.”

Race is hard to call
Gender issues have become key in this District 2 race.

Barber makes it a point to criticize Arizona’s new law to allow some religious employers to drop insurance coverage for women’s prescription contraceptives. He also praises the Affordable Care Act for prohibiting insurance companies from charging women for preventive care.

Some of his comments have backfired. Criticizing a lack of gender, ethnic and religious diversity among Republicans in Congress, Barber called GOP lawmakers in an interview with the Arizona Daily Star “a bunch of White guys.”

McSally said the remark was “divisive.”

McSally also cried foul over an outside Democratic group’s ad against her. The House Majority PAC, a political action committee, ran a television spot featuring cooking images and called her platform a “recipe for disaster.” McSally called it sexist.

Barber’s campaign, which did not have a role in the ad, distanced itself from it. The political action group replaced it a few days later with a different ad.

And as Election Day looms closer, political strategists continue to disagree over the outcome of the race.

“Things look good for him,” said Democratic political strategist Steele, who has donated to Barber’s campaign. “By any objective standards (McSally is) a strong candidate. ... But even before Ron worked for Gabby, he was well-known throughout southern Arizona. He’s built a reputation as honest and fair- dealing.”

Republicans disagree.

“(It) is now a very close battle,” said Deputy Political and Polling Director Brock McCleary of the National Republican Congressional Committeee. “I really attribute that to Martha McSally.”